« Previous entry: 'OMG, Pervert Gift Guide!'
x Back to homepage
x OMG, MORE MALE CELEBS!
» Next entry: 'OMG, She Speaks: Joan Rivers'


!! OMG, He's Naked: Jesus Luz !!


luz2.jpg

Heeeyyyy, so Dlisted found an outtake from Madonna's W Magazine photoshoot from a few months ago, and what do you know!? In this one you can get a glimpse of boytoy Jesus Luz's thing, which of course is as smooth as the baby Jesus's bare behind. (I swear to God, does any straight man have pubes anymore?)

Check out the pics after the jump... just cover the part of the screen where Madonna appears, cause the sight of her bonerkilling glare is enough to make your penis invert itself! NSFW! Thanks to de Cosmos for the tip.

madonnaluz.jpg

luz.jpg

[Dlisted]

(More Nude Male Celebs)


» READ THESE RELATED ENTRIES:
OMG, he's naked: James Marsden
OMG gossip: Female pole vaulter is a very sexy man
OMG, he's naked: James Franco
OMG, he's naked: James Ransone
OMG, they had it coming: Westboro Baptist Church
__________

posted by Bmad on Friday, January 22, 2010 Bookmark and Share
comments: 31 | category: Smuttastic |

» subscribe to category (Smuttastic):


 



comments


the penis is hot!

madonna is scary!LOL

Posted by: maccallister | February 15, 2010 2:13 AM

__________

That is one ugly penis ...
No wonder W didnt use the shot.

Posted by: Eddie | February 2, 2010 10:59 PM

__________

The Brazillian men I've been with were all uncircumcised. Only a small percentage are cut or just have a short foreskin. Jesus appears to have a bare head or was instructed to retract it for the picture. Maybe Madonna is a material girl and had him circumcised? Any one know what his real status is?

Posted by: ANON95762 | February 1, 2010 11:53 PM

__________

All the Brazillian guys I've been with were all uncircumcised. Jesus appears to be cut in the photo. Can any one confirm his status. I'd hate for him to be incomplete.

Posted by: Anon95762 | February 1, 2010 11:24 AM

__________

Someone (who is a huge fan of Madonna) that she only dates very well endowed men (8" plus). Now unless Jesus is a grower.....cuz he sure ain't a shower. hahahaha....Who really cares about Jesus' endowment, lack there of, or if it is him or not......Anyway....I have a boner for her ex husband Guy Ritchie - so why....oh why, would anyone ever leave a mean like Guy....he is fucking adorable, hot, sexy, is all man, looks great in jeans, a kilt, or a tux. I can only fantasize what Guy is like naked.

Posted by: Dan | January 25, 2010 8:47 PM

__________

Yeah, where did madonnas neck go?! And what's with the nun outfit? Still love her haha

Posted by: reniculous. | January 25, 2010 5:29 PM

__________

My reasoning why I don't think it is a fake (I posted this elsewhere, but thought I would add it here)...

(1) W magazine is known for nudes, therefore, it is highly possible Jesus was nude and the photographer was just snapping away (even though the pic was not used in the issue).

(2) There are other pics of Madonna in the same outfit from the shoot, but not that particular pose or 'face'. Some, have stated that her face was photoshopped on. I suspect airbrushing, but not a cut and paste job. Someone stated elsewhere her shoulders were too high...think about why her shoulders would be up higher (like she is leaning on something with her hands).

(3) Mention of him in other pics (later photoshoots) having a 'bush' down below, but not here. If you look at those and compare, he also had a treasure trail. Another pic, from the same photoshoot, you can see no treasure trail, so it is highly likely he was shaved for this one.

(4) A mention on another board about the background being different. The only difference is the angle of the shot. In the pic used in the magazine, you can see flowers, but in the nude picture, you can't because the blinds/Madonna's head block it due to the angle of the shot.

(5) His head was cut off...Who was the focus on in the photoshoot, Madonna or Jesus? Jesus was just a background model. If Madonna, afterwards didn't start taking a liking for him (having him as an escort), this would be a non-issue.

(6) Fakes usually enhance an endowment, this doesn't. It looks natural after coming out of a cold pool. Note the inclement appearing weather in the background, so it may have been a bit chilly.

(7) If you blow the picture up, you will see that there is no reflection of the so-called towel. I see two legs coming up toward a natural point, and the railing from the pool, no towel reflection.

It's easy to claim a fake, but don't see it here. I have been fooled before, so if there is proof that this is not real, let us have it in pictures. If it is, I will happily concede and add it to my portfolio of fakes, but I need picture/source proof.

Posted by: CB | January 25, 2010 4:40 PM

__________

you know how you can tell its reall.....look at those veiny arms! her face was not photoshopped in this pic at all.

Posted by: andrew | January 25, 2010 3:17 PM

__________

I Think She Is Beautiful.

Posted by: TomBigbee87 | January 25, 2010 2:53 PM

__________

Sometimes I think the gay community has a lot going for itself. Then I come here and read all the reasons why the world thinks we're all pretentious queens. No wonder we're treated like second-class citizens. How about you guys get some class so the rest of us can stop being judged by the likes of you.

That, by the way, is aimed at: JP, matt, Stephen and all the other fags like them.

Posted by: Gray | January 25, 2010 1:47 AM

__________

» View older comments »


add a new comment