_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

comments

Seth, that's not his other hand, look CLOSELY, or save it to your desktop and zoom in. Look at the picture where his other hand is peeking out from behind his ass (the cock is still visible). And Jakeoff, the penis would not dangle. You can't suspend a naked man horizontally in mid-air and not able to see any wires or anything. The way they make it look as if he's "levitating", is that the actors are shot standing up, and the CAMERA is turned 90 degrees on it's side to make it look like he's "floating".

Posted by: Dave | March 22, 2010 3:38 AM

__________

He would be hotter if he didn't trim those pits down so much.

Posted by: Pete | March 21, 2010 9:41 AM

__________

He would be hotter if he didn't trim those pits down so much.

Posted by: Pete | March 21, 2010 9:37 AM

__________

I get your puzzlement Seth, as it barely qualifies as nudity because so little is visible. However, in pic magnusson9 you can see the fingers of the background hand behind him, so it can't be that hand. Being a movie, who knows what techniques were in play though, after all a penis should dangle in that position. So was he really standing or what, who knows. Frankly the torso pics are a lot better than those side shots.

Posted by: jakeoff | March 20, 2010 12:35 PM

__________

i don't think that's his wiener.... i think its his hand.

Posted by: Seth | March 18, 2010 2:44 AM

__________

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

add a new comment

name email (required, but will not be visible) url (optional) remember me comment text (you may use HTML tags for style)