!! OMG, he’s naked: YouTube sensation Lance Stewart !!

YouTube sensation Lance Stewart has over 3 MILLION Youtube subscribers! Let’s add a few more after you find what he’s packing after the NSFW jump!

CLICK TO ENLARGE!

» share:

28 Comments on "OMG, he’s naked: YouTube sensation Lance Stewart"

  1. Who the hell buys a Camaro in this day and age? Only a douchebag would think that’s a cool car

  2. lol that dick is as fake as his YouTube videos.

  3. Grayson Douglass-Holmes | October 6, 2017 at 10:17 pm | Reply

    He wanking over his Mom’s shoes?

  4. he should have worn the yellow pumps on the closet floor to set off his great mushroom head cock

  5. FAKE…TAKE IT DOWN.
    IN FACT HE SHOULD BE SUED

  6. And his feet are not ugly. They are a foot fetishist’s delight!

  7. He isn’t all that cute in the face but the rest of him is sensational!

  8. Internet is full of faceless dick pix … just grab a random shot and say it’s somebody semi-famous ~ happens all th3 time.

  9. Hello-

    i greatly thank this site for the many dick pics it has posted where you’can’
    tell its the person. but why do they insist on posting dick pics that are
    clearly not the person?

  10. Great beautiful cock but how do we know it’s his? From his vids you can’t tell he’s packing so it could be him? Yum

  11. faaaake ! (and ugly feet)

  12. FAKE PIC. Take it down. Look at where the one finger is cut off due to the bad photoshop overlay. C’mon!

  13. A faceless dick pic is all the evidence I need, it’s him without a shadow of a doubt.
    I mean who else could it possibly be?

  14. The angle or something about the phallus seems off with the rest of the picture. Whether or not it’s him it seems like trick photography or editing.

  15. Why even bother posting these faceless cock pics? No proof it’s him.

  16. I’d spit and I’d slobber on it and shove it straight up my man-vag

  17. The arms don’t match. They are much hairier in the naked photo.

  18. The body in that picture doesn’t seem to match the other photos and that arm is way hairier than the one in the photos of him. I’m not saying it’s for sure fake but I’m suspicious.

  19. Nice cock- but doubt it is him- his arms don’t seem as hairy as they are in the other pictures.

  20. Soooo not him. His hairless arms aren’t gripping that cock.

  21. Michael Lawson | October 3, 2017 at 9:39 pm | Reply

    FAKE

  22. That is a massively huge cock

  23. mmmmmm..

  24. That could be ANY white guy EVER!

  25. Uh-huh. Yeah, yeah. But does anybody know where I can get my hands on those hot yellow vinyl mules? Cha-Cha Contest, here I cum!

  26. Gorgeous pecs but the rest… not so much.

  27. He’s not naked. A faceless cock pic is all there is.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

*