!! omg blog !!

music LOL gay politics movies tv
cute fail gossip art fashion candy
banner-spacer-05.gif banner-spacer-05.gif

« Previous entry: 'OMG, what a licky baby: Deer Bathes Cat'
x Back to homepage
x OMG, more nude male celebs!
» Next entry: 'OMG, how morbid: Clown Funeral'

!! OMG, he's naked: Mick Jagger !!


David Bowie must have had his hands full during his alleged affair with Mick. See how full in an NSFW still from the 1970 film Performance, which was reportedly cut before the movies release after the jump.

fff mj.JPG

(Image Source)

(Click for more nude male celebs)

OMG, he was naked: Alexis Arquette
OMG, he's naked: Dominic Fumusa
OMG, he's naked: John Barrowman
OMG, he's naked: Ralph Fiennes
OMG, he's naked: Jesus

» posted by Graydon on Thursday, July 23, 2009
comments: 9 | category: Candy |



Wrong Matt, they were cut. I've seen the very interesting (and not boring) film many times. At no point does Mick's full frontal body appear. Most critics agree it is one of the finest films ever made. Sorry Vanessa, I doubt you know how big David Bowie is, and you don't know how big Mick is either, because he doesn't have an erection here and you don't judge endowment by flaccid size. No Wow, his penis isn't quite small. It's perfectly noramal sized, and looks quite healthy in it's flaccid state. Some penises grow much larger when erect.

» posted by Chris | January 18, 2013 11:49 AM

This is a picture of a normal flaccid penis. Of course it's small. Any man's is, unless you're John Holmes or something.

» posted by Teresa | October 31, 2012 12:54 AM

His penis is quite small.

» posted by wow | June 10, 2010 7:14 AM

Oh all u haters just have to be jealous and bring up the rumor about Davis!!!Get a life you morons !! Mick rocks and even if he did sleep with david i don`t care i still would love mick anyway and marry him if i could!!

GET a frigging life

» posted by vicki | April 24, 2010 12:24 AM

I think Mick is the one who may have had his hands full with David. David is much more well endowed. Much!

» posted by Vanessa Sterling | August 16, 2009 10:43 PM

What am i looking at anyway?

» posted by bogart4017 | July 24, 2009 3:15 PM

does he have 2 penises in the pic???

» posted by hunkymonkey | July 24, 2009 10:54 AM

OMG! This site is becoming an Internet wayback machine of poor quality nudity that happened before most of us were even born.

» posted by jakeoff | July 23, 2009 9:06 PM

these scenes were never cut. the film was never a huge success over here anyway, more of a cult film, and a bit boring actually.

» posted by Matt | July 23, 2009 8:35 AM

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

add a new comment